Friday, 21 October 2022

Drawing AI Stable Diffusion: The Science of Drawing


Stable Diffusion AI is the place where art and science meet together

And why it's important step for both art and science

    There have been seven museums in the world in the last century devoted to the science of painting. Two in Europe, two in Japan, and one each in Switzerland, Belgium, and the United States such asThe National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C.

Drawing AI Stable Diffusion: The Science of Drawing


    Our ancestors had fairly sophisticated ways of communicating with each other about these kinds of events. There was science – either art or a mix of art and science, like that in the painting of the amazing Brueghel and other masterworks.

    Three Dutch and English scientists who were working with famous sculptor and scientist Augustus Jean Borrie at a local art school in the 17th century wrote a science fiction story about a beautiful scientist who tries to solve the problems of outer space by flying in his suit. Borrie's workshop, the Borrie Science Laboratory, was used as a science museum, especially during the World's Columbian Exposition in Chicago in 1893.

Science fiction is a part of the history of science, of science art, of science development. And science museums like the Smithsonian Art Museum and its National Air and Space Museum also have art and science exhibits. Today scientists working on science in museums and museums themselves use a lot of science. And science and art are related – art can help us see the world in new ways, helping us understand ourselves, the world, and science itself in new ways. That is, in a very important sense, science and art are not separate subjects. They are more like bridges between science and art. But, like bridges, they can carry us apart as well as together. Science and art are both art and science. But that is why art is so important in science.
Drawing AI Stable Diffusion: The Science of Drawing


    Art helps us develop new methods for science, helping us build new ideas for our understanding of the world. If we can imagine art and science, then we can create a bridge between them and build new models for science and art. How we build new ideas for art and science can be reflected in how we make things in art, how we build machines and machines that make things, how we develop new medicines, new ideas of art and science. Art, science, and science art are the different ways that humans have for creating art and science to communicate, to understand, to solve problems, and to understand the world around us.

    And, as a result, art and science are interdependent. Art and science help each other. I think that is a very good thing. Scientists do not need art. They do not need art to find out more about art, art to understand more about science, art to communicate, to understand other people, and to solve problems in science. But scientists might need science art. Some scientists might need science art to understand the world, and to communicate what they understand. And some scientists might need science art to understand and solve new problems and find new answers.

Art and science help each other. Art helps us to develop new ideas and new ideas for the future. And science art helps us understand what is different in art and what is different in science. Art, science, and science art are not separate subjects. But they are different things.
Drawing AI Stable Diffusion: The Science of Drawing


And they can be changed. What they are can change. This might happen in art museums, museums of science, museums that allow science and art to interact – but this is not necessarily the case. With new scientific theories and new scientific technologies, art and science have changed. For a very long time, scientific theories and scientific technology helped each other. But art also changed. Art has expanded – it has gone beyond just making things like paintings, sculptures, and sculptures of scientific instruments to make art about science and new things that science creates. Art is more sophisticated now than ever before. Art has gone beyond just art and science. And science art has been created.

I think this is also a very good thing. Science art helps us to create a bridge between science and art. And that bridge is not meant to be a fixed idea or something that only exists in one place. It is not meant to be only science. It is not just art. It is something that develops over time – it changes over time. And it is more than just art. Art does not exist in a vacuum. Art is one of many kinds of communication between people, science is another. And science art is another one of many forms of communication between people. And, I think this is a good thing.
Drawing AI Stable Diffusion: The Science of Drawing


The new bridges we build between science and art will help to change how science is communicated to us – and, in a very important sense, art is helping us to understand and do science. We do not have to look for art in science museums. We can look for art in science museums. And we can look for science art and science art in science museums. And that is a great thing – science and art are changing.

They are changing for the better.

Tuesday, 17 May 2022

Metaverses. Computer games are the engine of a new reality.


    The Metaverse is a computer simulation of a three-dimensional world using virtual and augmented reality. It is assumed that, unlike existing virtual environments, it will be possible to spend almost a whole day in this computer world. In addition, the developers promise high realism and functionality to engage in almost any activity - from some kind of business activity, meetings, virtual offices to any goals, gyms, meetings, maintaining relationships across the universe. This is all we are promised by the leaders of this sphere.

    The technologies for the implementation of the metaverse already exist, just that they are not yet suitable for mass use in terms of economic and technical characteristics. As soon as the number of users of the metaverse reaches the threshold of 300-500 million, then everything will change. Firstly, devices for entering the metaverse will immediately become cheaper, because the price of their development will be distributed among all users, and secondly, since the operators of the metaverse will earn on collecting data and selling digital goods, this will become extremely profitable.

     Using the metaverse will help save money and avoid additional risk in a pandemic. It will be possible to meet with friends, work, be at a meeting without leaving home. In addition, there are already many studies of virtual reality showing that a person reacts to virtual reality in much the same way as to the real world. There is a famous experiment where in virtual reality a person sees a skyscraper with a plank protruding beyond the building. In reality, this board lies in an ordinary room on the floor, and the person knows this. And still, it is very difficult for people to walk along it, because in virtual reality the body and brain very quickly forget about it and see a board on the roof of a skyscraper in front of them. This is the most popular experiment among budding researchers and can be found in numerous YouTube videos.

    If the realism of the virtual environment develops, then in the near future people will be able to experience emotions that, for financial or some other reasons, are not available to them in the real world. There is another famous experiment about a Korean girl. In virtual reality, an exact copy of the deceased seven-year-old girl was recreated using videos recorded with her. Her mother was very grateful. Perhaps in the metaverses we will be able to make similar virtual copies of the departed people.

    There are a lot of risks in such projects. First, of course, there are the most negative scenarios, up to the matrix scenario about the fact that we all go into this universe and forget about the real world. Or that it will be easier for the state to improve the metauniverse than the real urban environment, and the streets of cities will turn into incomprehensible things.

    In addition, at this stage, when there is such high competition and everyone urgently wants their own metaverse, it is very likely that virtual spaces will be extremely vulnerable to hacker attacks. Because everyone wants to quickly release a new device or create some kind of attractive environment to lure as many users as possible. At the same time, developers forget about things like cybersecurity. But given that, as I said earlier, a person reacts to this reality in much the same way as to the real one, there are risks that hackers will be able to manipulate emotions and moods. At this stage, while there are no recognized security standards, this is a rather big risk.

    Now the engine of this whole story is computer games. Microsoft recently bought major gaming company Activision Blizzard in one of the company's largest deals and shows that the fight for leadership in building the metaverse has already begun.

    

Saturday, 9 April 2022

Bacteria have been using CRISPR for millions of years.

    This discovery, on the one hand, discouraged scientists, and on the other hand, pointed to a new way to deal with resistant bacteria. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is considered one of the major threats to human health.

    Scientists at the University of Copenhagen have discovered that primitive bacterial parasites use CRISPR to fight each other. They have probably been doing this for millions of years. Now scientists intend to use evolutionary advances to counter resistant bacteria. 

   This discovery, on the one hand, discouraged scientists, and on the other hand, pointed to a new way to deal with resistant bacteria. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is considered one of the major threats to human health.

    Scientists at the University of Copenhagen have discovered that primitive bacterial parasites use CRISPR to fight each other. They have probably been doing this for millions of years. Now scientists intend to use  evolutionary advances to counter resistant bacteria. 

    Scientists have, of course, found a way to take advantage of this situation as well. Since this system most likely evolved to specifically attack plasmids, it is likely that it could be used to attack plasmids carrying antibiotic-resistant genes, Pinilla-Redondo said.

    Bacteria become resistant to antibiotics by acquiring genes that form resistance to drugs. Very often this happens when plasmids transport such genes from one bacterium to another. By disrupting this mechanism with the help of CRISPR programmed for this purpose, one can potentially cope with the problem, the authors say.

    Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is one of the main threats to human health, so all potential strategies to combat resistance will be evaluated by scientists in the next stages of research.

    Another tool to fight resistant bacteria could be the device of American scientists. They have developed a device that identifies them in the patient's blood.

Scientists have shown how vitamin K protects the brain from dementia.

     Vitamin K properties have shown promising neuroprotective effects on the aging rat brain. Now, vitamin supplements are being considered as a preventive measure for people with a high predisposition to dementia, but they will not be recommended for a group of patients with cardiovascular pathologies.  

   Previous research has linked vitamin K to certain brain functions, and its deficiency is associated with Alzheimer's disease, the most common form of dementia. In a new study, scientists from the University of Al-Maarif (Saudi Arabia) have uncovered a molecular pathway that explains the protective properties of vitamin K for cognitive functions, writes Medical Express.

    Vitamin K is a fat-soluble vitamin that is divided into the form K1 (phylloquinone) and K2 (menaquinone). K1 is found in leafy greens and some vegetables, while K2 is synthesized in the gut and is present in animal products.

    In rat models, the scientists tested the effects of menaquinone-7 (MK-7) at three months of age for up to 17 months. Compared with the control group, MK-7 supplementation clearly improved the cognitive performance of rodents as they age.

    There was a decrease in cognitive impairment, depression and anxiety, better spatial memory and learning ability.At the end of the experiment, studying samples of rat brain tissue, the scientists found the involvement of NLRP3, caspase-1 and Nrf-2 proteins in the vitamin K biological pathways. These proteins play an important role in inflammation reactions and antioxidant activity. In addition, vitamin K probably increased the expression of tyrosine, an amino acid necessary for maintaining cognitive functions, the authors say. 

    So far, scientists are not recommending vitamin K supplementation as a preventive measure against brain aging. Only further clinical studies can determine them. Meanwhile, patients taking blood thinners and other medications should avoid supplementing with vitamin K, which is involved in the body's blood clotting process, they stressed.

    Another study reported that halting the progression of Alzheimer's disease could be achieved by supplementing the diet with vitamins E and C, which counteract reactive oxygen species.

    

Friday, 8 April 2022

How humans and animals experience unpredictable and uncontrollable events.

     What doesn't kill us makes us... What? The end of this phrase depends on the specific case and many factors, both external and internal. How stress turns into trauma in humans and dogs, and what we can do for ourselves and for our pets to prevent this from happening.

    The basic principles by which we experience stress or trauma are the same for all mammals, especially highly social ones such as humans and other primates, dogs, rats, dolphins, elephants. Sociality plays a twofold role here: sometimes it causes stress where a single animal would not have it (anxiety about relationships with relatives, fear of loneliness, uncertainty about one's status, pain of losing a social partner), but it also provides very effective tools to deal with stress so that it does not turn into injury.

    In the everyday sense, stress is usually understood as distress, that is, negative stress that we perceive as an unpleasant experience. However, in a scientific sense, any novelty that we encounter is stressful, and its complete absence quickly leads to boredom and degradation. Canadian endocrinologist Hans Selye formulated a theory in which stress is divided according to its effect on the body into positive (eustress) and negative (distress). Distinguishing one from the other is quite simple within subjective experience: we later remember eustress as an interesting adventure, but we don’t want to remember distress at all.

    It is more difficult to understand from the outside whether for someone else a certain event is eustress or distress (especially for animals or young children who cannot express their attitude to the experience in words). When someone reacts to a difficult and unpleasant event with phrases like “don’t worry, it’s nothing”, “nobody complained about this nowadays”, he unconsciously passes off wishful thinking - distress for eustress. If only it worked like this..

    .The situation when eustress turns into distress (and vice versa) is individual for each living being. The main factors for reducing distress come down to two: control and predictability. In order for the situation not to test the adaptive abilities of our nervous system, it must be either predictable or controlled. Or at least we should take it seriously as such. The latter explains the attractiveness of religions and ideologies.

    If, in the midst of chaos and unpredictable danger, one firmly believes that everything is in the hand of God or that it is part of an objective, good and correct historical process (for example, the movement of society towards building communism), the level of the stress hormone cortisol decreases in much the same way as if a person had a real opportunity to influence the situation.

    And any eschatology is an attempt to reduce stress by believing in the predictability of the end of the world.

    This beneficial effect of faith was noted by many intellectuals who survived the events of the Second World War. Viktor Frankl's psychotherapeutic system is built on it: to find some meaning in the disasters that you are undergoing.

    The philosopher Jean Amery, who, like Frankl, survived imprisonment in a Nazi concentration camp, also noted this effect, only with a feeling of bitterness: it is much easier to survive in a camp for a fanatical believer (in God or in communism) than for a secular humanist who recognizes the objective unpredictability and uncontrollability of the situation. On the other hand, we are now seeing how a critical mindset allows people to quickly move on to finding solutions, that is, ways to gain at least some real, rather than imaginary elements of control and predictability - for example, to start helping those who are worse off.

    For those who care about intellectual and ethical values, any effort to maintain their conscience and sobriety in the midst of everything that happens also helps to reduce stress: we gain control over our inner life at least when we filter information, when we keep from joining the aggressor and blaming the victim, from moral relativism.

    Do you really need to deal with stress right now? The damage from long-term exposure affects many aspects of our health, in fact, it is the constant maintenance of the body in a state of readiness "fight or flight" to the detriment of all long-term functions: immunity, digestion, reproduction, growth (in children), rest and recovery. No animal, argues Robert Sapolsky, is designed for this: in nature, life is so harsh that maintaining a stress response when there is no immediate physical threat is a senseless waste.

    Having run away from a predator or catching prey, the animal relaxes, instead of the sympathetic nervous system, the parasympathetic (responsible for rest) is activated.

    People, especially adults, are not good at it. We have abstract thinking and a speech model of the world that make our brain experience events that are not happening to us at this moment: remember past troubles, fear future ones, or sympathize with people who are far away from us (empathy is developed in animals no less than in humans , but they need to be nearby for this). The reaction of the organism to these experiences is the same as to an immediate physical danger. If we follow the tragic news without interruption and try to predict the development of a situation that we have no control over, it's like running away from rhinos for weeks: the body works at its limit and does not get rest.

    The brain suffers greatly, because with prolonged stress, sleep is disturbed, which is necessary for its purification from metabolic products. In addition, the process of analyzing information consumed in huge quantities requires an increased supply of sugar to the brain: this is bad for both anorexia nervosa and bulimia (stress eating, especially sweet).

    Therefore, even if taking care of your health seems selfish now (keep in mind that loved ones and those you can help depend on you), maintaining the physical ability of the brain to fully function is necessary in order to preserve your ethical and intellectual values.

   When distress affects the psyche more or longer than it can withstand, they talk about trauma or PTSD. This means that something happened that punched a hole in the adaptive abilities of a person or animal. But how does trauma work? Usually it is presented as simple and understandable: for example, a dog was scared by a cyclist in childhood and now she is afraid of them. Most clients who turn to a zoopsychologist with the problem of fears in an animal are trying to remember some event from his past that would logically explain these fears. 

    For example, a case from practice: someone threw two-month-old puppies to the fence of the shelter. The hostess stumbled upon them when she was walking with a shelter dog, and she managed to gnaw on the puppies: one was killed, the other was saved. She was treated for a long time, after which the new owner took the grown girl to her. She turned to me when the dog was already a year old, with a problem - the strongest fear and aggression ... towards people. Our patient treated other dogs quite calmly, although, it would seem, it was them that she should have been afraid of after her experience in childhood.

    The fact is that the injury does not “fall” on a clean slate, but happens to an animal that at that time already has at least a species-specific behavior, as well as some kind of life experience, albeit a small one. And it depends on what part of the traumatic event it will remember, what “conclusions” it will draw. Puppies that are thrown into a shelter are most often born to mothers who live in not very close emotional contact with a person: chained, aviary, half-domestic, half-homeless. In their one and a half to two months, such puppies receive little experience in communicating with people, their world consists of a mother and siblings. The alien dog that attacked them was not the first dog in their life, but the appearance of a person with him, and most importantly, the weeks that followed this in the veterinary clinic, where there was no one from the puppy’s former life, but there were many people, consolidated their association with fear and pain.

    Trauma is not about an objective understanding of the situation with all its causes and nuances (for example, how does a puppy know that people in white coats poking him with needles want good), but about fragmentary impressions that the brain picks up and interprets within the framework of its past experience .

    This explains why people who have experienced the same traumatic events (for example, a war) remember and evaluate them differently.

    Of great importance is the difference between the psyche of an adult and a cub, and during growing up also a specific age at which potentially traumatic events occurred. For example, a two-month-old puppy successfully survived an evacuation under fire and a long journey to a safe country. He shows no signs of increased stress or injury. This can be explained both by a naturally strong nervous system and by the correct actions of a person, but age is extremely important. A month later, the puppies begin a sensitive period, the age of fears, when everything that the cub has not had time to get used to in advance frightens him - and the reaction of a person largely determines whether this fear will be fixed for life. Therefore, the same puppy that has gone through extreme events with the same owner can grow up to be a completely different dog, depending on how many months old he was.

    One of the manifestations of trauma is learned helplessness - the rollback of an adult animal into the state of a cub that does not take active steps to improve its position (for example, does not crawl out of the cage where it is shocked, although it can). This happens when no actions have helped to improve the situation for a long time, and sometimes it goes away on its own over time, and sometimes it requires correction. One of the powerful factors in the fight against learned helplessness is exploratory behavior: when we analyze information, all panic reactions of the body level out, and the horizon of perception expands (this is also the basis for the techniques for overcoming a panic attack “look around and name the objects that you see around you”, and assessment situations in martial arts - turn your head around, noting where the exit is, whether the attacker has accomplices, at what distance they are).

   The fact is that we are organically unable to panic and process information at the same time. One turns off the other. Therefore, in dogs, for which the main channel of information is the sense of smell, the process of sniffing automatically reduces the level of stress. Correcting the fear of the street, cynologists and zoopsychologists try to select places for walking where there are a lot of smells interesting to the dog, not to interrupt the sniffing process, but to encourage it. For humans, the closest analogue to sniffing is reading. It is easier to panic from what you see or hear than from what you read.

    Unfortunately, this effect causes people to unknowingly get themselves into the trap of doomscrolling (endless tape reading in search of terrible news). 

    At the moment when we read and search for information, fear is almost not felt - but then the whole array of bad news found falls on our consciousness when we try to sleep or have lunch.

    The mechanisms of stress and trauma are so complex that there can be no single measure of a traumatic event: sometimes you can get out of the worst tragedy without injury, and in another case, some seemingly trifle pulls a chain of reactions that unsettles us for years. The most dangerous of these chains are called developmental traumas - when something happened in the early stages of growing up that violated its natural course. For example, the owners simply decided to keep the puppy at home for a longer time without walking, not realizing that this is tantamount to isolating the child within four walls until school. The brain did not receive the stimuli it needed, constantly updated information about the outside world, and then it turned out to be no longer able to process it - the dog is terribly afraid of everything outside the apartment, and inside it shudders from any sounds.

   Another kind of such a chain reaction is when an adult's trauma leads to developmental trauma in his children. Any humanitarian catastrophes - wars, natural disasters, epidemics - produce such chains of traumatic reactions at once on an enormous scale. Parents who have experienced extreme ordeals tend to be overly protective of their child, limiting his or her attempts to master the environment, making it clear that the world is a dangerous and sad place. This anxiety is projected even onto animals - often worried owners see a dangerous fight where the dogs are just actively playing. 

   There are no universal ways to avoid stress or prevent it from escalating into trauma. If inwardly a person at least understands what feelings he is experiencing (although a stress reaction can disrupt contact with emotions), then little is clear about those around him whom he wants to help. You can do a lot of things wrong without knowing, for example, that a stressed dog should not be thrown a ball (this will only overload the nervous system faster), and a person should be pestered with advice to “think positively.” Therefore, if it is not possible to consult with a specialist, then with confidence you can rely only on the stress reduction mechanisms inherent in all social animals - that is, on communication. Simply being unobtrusive (unless asked to leave), caring, and paying attention to the other's cues, whether verbal or expressed in body language.

    Sometimes the presence of a significant social partner turns out to be a more important factor in dealing with stress than physical security, the availability of food, medicines.

    These considerations are important to take into account when making any long-term decision - for example, soberly assess the level of affection between you and your pet, deciding what is more important for him: to travel with you in rather unpredictable conditions or to stay for some time in more stable, but without you; how easy it will be for the animal to adapt in another family; whether to separate two dogs from you or from each other. Unfortunately, now people massively have to make decisions in a state of actual stress (or even already traumatized), trying to assess stress factors in the future. 

Scientists have modified E. coli, and now it produces a cure for Parkinson's disease directly in the human body.

     American scientists have created a genetically modified Escherichia coli E. coli Nissle 1917, which produces levodopa, an effective drug for Parkinson's disease. The microorganism can now continuously produce it directly in the human body, writes Naked Science.

    Levodopa is similar in action to the neurotransmitter dopamine. It regulates movement. Patients with Parkinson's disease must receive the drug continuously, otherwise the symptoms will quickly return.

    The genetically modified bacillus is able to live in the human intestine and continuously produce levodopa there. Its dosage can be varied by controlling the level of a rare sugar called rhamnose in the microbes. It affects the activity of the gene that synthesizes the drug.

    Experiments on mice were successful. Scientists believe that the bacterial route of drug delivery could help treat depression, Alzheimer's disease and other conditions that require constant medication.

Biomimicry: why imitating nature can save us from ecological disaster.

     Mimicry is a similarity developed in the course of evolution between two biological species. Sometimes it is useful to one of them, sometimes it is mutually beneficial. Biomimicry, on the other hand, is when technologies, architecture or design mimic the forms, structures and processes that exist in nature. Robots, for example, are made in the image and likeness of either cockroaches, or octopuses, or cheetahs.

    The Secret of the Deserted Pond.

    When biology educator Janine Benius bought a house in Stevensville, in the far northwest of the United States, she was assured that the backyard pond would be home to a variety of birds, from blue-winged teals to Canada geese. However, very little time passed, and the water in the pond became cloudy, and its surface was covered with duckweed. It would seem that these algae, which in English are called "duck" (duckweed), should have attracted ducks and other birds. But it turned out that when there are too many duckweeds in the pond, the birds fly around it. For two years, birds flew to the pond, looking for nesting sites, but, looking around, flew away.

    To save the reservoir from desolation, Janine Benius began to regularly scoop out the duckweed. Each time after that, however, the algae grew more than before. Experts advised the woman to use chemicals, but since there were turtles in the pond, Benius immediately rejected their offer. When she asked the experts for more natural ways to clean up the pond, they just shrugged.

  At some point, Benius gave up and, sitting on the shore, plunged into fantasies. She imagined how she would like to see her pond: clean, with a healthy balance between algae and water, with birds of different species vying for a place in the sun. Suddenly, Benius realized that this fantasy pond was not a fantasy at all, but actually an existing place. Putting on rubber boots, the woman got on her bicycle and rode to a pond in a nearby protected forest, which she had already passed once.

    All day long she had been watching this clear pool, only fringed with algae and lush vegetation. Benius tried to solve his riddle. She dipped her hand into the water and noticed that it was much colder than the pond in her yard.

    When a poplar leaf floated on the surface of the water, it dawned on her: there is a current in the pond!

    In her own reservoir, a current arose only during the spring floods, when the snow melted and dirty waters arrived from the surrounding fields. Benius guessed that, apparently, her pond was a spring and somewhere at the bottom had a source of cold, fresh water. He, however, was buried under layers of soil brought from the fields, which had been eroded for many years due to the fact that livestock grazed on it. The pond silted up, heated up and became suitable only for duckweed, but not for ducks.

    Returning home, Benius took a shovel, climbed into the pond and began to probe the bottom to find the coldest point. When the woman found it, she began to dig. Suddenly cold water began to rise from the bottom. The turbidity dissipated, and the duckweed washed ashore. Very soon, two families of geese settled in the pond.

    All our technologies are already invented by nature.

    What Janine Benius did with her pond is an example of biomimicry, which can be translated as "imitation of life." Being one of the main specialists of our time in this field and the founder of the Institute of Biomimicry, in her 1997 book “Biomimicry. Innovations inspired by nature” Benius defines this phenomenon as follows:

    "Biomimicry is a new science that studies the models of nature and imitates them or is inspired by its designs and processes to solve human problems."

   Designers, robot developers, architects and other professionals, in need of ideas for their inventions, are increasingly spying on nature. And for good reason, because other organisms already millions of years ago invented the technologies that we need today. At the same time, they do without combustible fuel, do not pollute the planet and do not endanger the existence of their descendants and other species.

    In addition, they cope with technological tasks much more elegantly than we do. Dragonflies, for example, outmanoeuvre our best helicopters. Ants, without any adaptations, collectively carry hundreds of kilograms of food and building materials over long distances. Bat radars outperform the best of our radars. This series of comparisons can be continued.

    “Our most ingenious posts and beams were anticipated by water lily leaves and bamboo stalks,” Benius writes in his book. “Our central heating and air conditioning is no match for the termite towers, where the temperature is constantly kept at 30 ˚C. <…> And our newest “smart materials” cannot be compared with the skin of a dolphin or the trunk of a butterfly.” 

    “Nature, forced by need to be quick-witted, has long ago solved the problems over which we puzzle. Our job is to take these time-tested ideas and apply them to our own lives,” concludes Benius.

    Why biomimicry is the future.

    By education, Benius is a specialist in forestry. She recalls that during her studies, she was not at all told about the close relationships between living beings. Reductionist teachers described each part of the forest separately, and the value of information was determined only by its usefulness for human life. Only when Benius began to independently study the relationship of living organisms in nature, she realized how inseparable animals are from the environment in which they live.

    We, until recently, perceived nature as something separate from us and existing solely for our needs, the scientist believes. We are accustomed to dominating nature, to cultivate it, to "improve" it. But according to Benius, it is time for our culture to “return to the forests”:

    “When we look to nature as a mentor, our relationship with the living world changes. Gratitude subdues greed, and as plant biologist Wes Jackson says, “the very concept of resources becomes obscene.”

    Biomimicry is based not on what we can take from nature, but on what we can learn from it.

    One of the features of natural technologies that exist in nature is that living organisms optimize the use of resources. Birds, for example, need a minimum of elements to give strength to their nests without any glue and cement. Biomimicry is our chance to minimize the amount of materials that we ourselves use in production. 

     And this will be followed by the reduction of waste. After all, by learning how to create durable materials, imitating the minimalism of nature, we can reduce the production of plastic and other artificial polymers.

    In addition, biomimicry will help to use energy more economically. An example is the products of REGEN Energy, which Janine Benius mentioned in her 2009 TED lecture on biomimicry. This company, now renamed Encycle, spied on the communication of ants and bees, created a swarm technology (English swarm technology), which allows you to coordinate household appliances in the house. With the help of wireless controllers, devices interact with each other and self-regulate so that one turns off when others are working.

    At this historic moment, “when we see the real possibility of the extinction of a quarter of all species in the next thirty years,” biomimicry becomes not only a new optics, but also a real salvation for all of us, sums up Benius. 

    Three forms of biomimicry

    Biomimicry, according to the classification of Janine Benius, is of three types. The case when a scientist spied on a pond in the wild and reproduced its characteristics in her own pond is an example of imitation of an entire ecosystem. But this is only one of the variants of biomimicry - the most complex and rare. Imitation of natural forms and processes is more common.

    Think, for example, about shoe "Velcro". The principle of operation of such a contact tape is borrowed from the burdock. Velcro microhooks are copied from the same devices on burrs. More recently, a scientist at Imperial College London has invented a soft surgical needle that mimics the sting of a wasp. Both are biomimicry of form.

    But the idea that self-driving cars of the future will be able to communicate with each other for coordinated movement around the city is reminiscent of how ants communicate, which, as you know, do not obey a single decision-making center. This is the biomimicry of processes.

    Let's analyze each of the types of biomimicry in more detail. 

    Kingfisher-beaked train: biomimicry as imitation of form.

    It was 1989. Japan has been working on ever faster trains for the Shinkansen railway network. One of the trains developed a speed of up to 273 km/h. And everything would be fine, but every time this train entered the tunnel, a powerful sound wave arose, which left the tunnel with a deafening pop, reminiscent of the sound of a shot. This noise, which could be heard 400 meters from the tunnel, disturbed not only passengers, but also local residents and animals living in the area. In addition, the compressed air that arose when the train entered the tunnel slowed down its movement.

    An engineering team was assembled to solve the problem. At first, I couldn't think of anything. But one day, one of the engineers, Eiji Nakatsu, read in the newspaper the announcement of a lecture on how many ideas airplane designers borrowed from birds. After listening to the lecture and inspired by it, Nakatsu suggested that his colleagues apply knowledge from ornithology to the design of trains. The experiments took several years.

    Different parts of the redesigned train were inspired by different birds. From the lecture, among other things, Nakatsu learned that owls, unlike most birds, fly without making any noise. This is due to the special notches on their feathers that break up sound waves. As a result, the engineers applied the same notches to the current collector of the entrance. This allowed to reduce the noise of the entrance when driving.

    However, the noise that arose when entering the tunnel did not go anywhere. Nakatsu, however, was already in the right mood and also turned to ornithology to solve this problem. The engineer thought: are there living beings in nature that daily face sharp drops in aerodynamic resistance?

    "Yes, there is - it's a kingfisher," Nakatsu realized. “To catch prey, the kingfisher dives from low-resistance air into high-resistance water, and does so without splashing.”

    But how does the kingfisher do it? All thanks to the unique shape of the beak: folded from two identical triangles with rounded sides, it is narrow and oblong, and its diameter increases from tip to base. When a kingfisher plunges into the water, she does not collide with his beak, but envelops him. And this is exactly what was missing from the train, which was designed by Nakatsu and his colleagues.

    When engineers tested the new train model in 1997, it was 10% faster, used 15% less electricity, and the noise from the train was less than 70 dB.

Robot Ants and Cancer Cells: Biomimicry as Process Mimicry.

    “An ant colony is made up of sterile female workers — those are the ants you usually see around — and one or more reproductive females that just lay eggs. They don't give any instructions. Although they are called queens, they do not tell anyone what to do. So in an ant colony there is no master, and all such systems without central control are regulated by very simple interactions, says biologist Deborah Gordon in a TED lecture. Ants interact using smells. They perceive smells with the help of their antennae and communicate also thanks to them. So when one ant touches another with these antennas, it can find out, for example, whether the other belongs to the same anthill and what task this other ant performs.

    Thanks to this decentralized interaction, ants are extremely successful in finding food in large areas. In particular, Argentine ants, says Gordon, are able to effectively find a balance between the thoroughness of the search and the area of ​​\u200b\u200bthe territory under study.

    When many ants accumulate in a small space, everyone searches very carefully. When a small number  of ants explore a large area, they sacrifice thoroughness but widen their search diameter.

Ant communication has inspired roboticists.

    It became clear that instead of sending one complex and expensive robot to explore another planet or search a burning building, it might be more efficient to use a group of cheaper robots that would exchange a minimum of information, as ants do,” says Gordon.

    An entire area of robotics, which in English is called swarm robotics, that is, group or “swarm” robotics, is built on imitation of the interaction of insects such as ants. Communication between such groups of robots is based on swarm intelligence.

   However, the benefits of observing ants are not limited to this. Deborah Gordon believes that studying the interactions between ants can also be useful for cancer treatment. We are talking about those types of cancer cells that - like ants that are not controlled from a single center - thanks to metastases, spread from the focus to other tissues to obtain resources:

    “Look at the situation from the point of view of metastatic cancer cells that are in search of the necessary resources: if the resources are grouped, then most likely they will begin to attract other cells. And if we understand how this “recruitment” happens, we may learn to set traps that prevent it.” 

   Prairie instead of a farm: biomimicry as an imitation of ecosystems.

    “Ten thousand years ago we first plowed rich soil. We saved the seeds, planted them, and rejoiced when they sprouted and gave us a harvest. We celebrated our liberation from the adventure of hunting and gathering, and this was followed by unprecedented grain harvests and the birth of our countless descendants. The more children we gave birth to, the more land we had to cultivate in order to feed our offspring, ”writes Janine Benius in the book Biomimicry. Innovations inspired by nature.

     While we secured long-term food supplies in this way, we also unwittingly stepped on a slippery slope that biologist Wes Jackson calls the “vigilance treadmill.” Janine Benius explains the essence of his metaphor this way: the more we cared for domesticated plants, the more they depended on us. Today, this treadmill seems to be unstoppable. Cultivated plants are so far from their descendants that they simply cannot survive without fertilizers and pesticides.

    At the same time, fertilizers and pesticides only hide the real problems. Fertilizers, for example, help us cover up a real threat: soil erosion. And we need pesticides, Benius explains, because genetic fragility and the inability to defend against insects is an inherent property of monocultures, that is, plants that grow in isolation from other species on giant plantations of hundreds of hectares.

    “Every day our soil, our crops and ourselves become more vulnerable,” says Benius. “What I want to know is how much longer are we going to keep this issue quiet?”

    Fortunately, some activists have already recognized these threats and are trying to find ways to overcome them. One such method is ecosystem biomimicry. This is what The Land Institute, a non-profit organization founded in 1976, does. Employees of the institute, which owns 270 acres of land, grow perennial cereals, legumes and oilseeds on these lands.

    The peculiarity of the local economy is that the farm is practically indistinguishable from the wild prairie.

    The institute team does not have to plow the land every year, because the crops they grow are perennial. Farmers do not remove weeds, do not use pesticides and herbicides, and generally interfere minimally in the life of this man-made ecosystem.

   “In front of me is a variety of forms: grasses of different heights and widths, a bold sweep of a sunflower, dark leaves of legumes that look like ferns. <…> Butterflies and bees, pollinators who like to scratch their tongues, spread rumors from one plant to another,” Janine Benius, who visited the farm, describes this farm.

    In this land of flowers and grasses and infested with ants, centipedes and bed bugs, each of the 231 cohabiting plants plays a role and cooperates with other species, she concludes.

     “Uproot or plant something new and you will already change the local microecology. Plow, pollinate or harvest every year and you will change it completely. Some of the organisms that will be gone may be those that increase the fertility of the soil, or help resist attacks by insects and diseases, or produce hormones that cause the flower to bloom and the root to sink its tentacles even deeper into the ground. It takes years to tune in such an orchestra of collaborating organisms, but it takes moments to silence it,” adds Benius.

    “The goal of the Land Institute is to create a community of domestic plants that is indistinguishable from a prairie, but that is predictable in terms of yield, to serve agricultural purposes,” says one of the institute’s employees, environmentalist John Piper.

    “We must run the economy the way nature does it,” adds the founder of the institute, the already mentioned biologist Wes Jackson. Instead of patronizing domesticated crops, we should build an agricultural system based on the natural benefits of the plants we grow.

    Why and how we need to talk to nature

    In order for a dialogue to take place between man and nature, you must first pacify your mind, and then listen to what nature says and echo back to it. Biomimicry is this echo. This is exactly what happened when Benius tried to clear her pond of turbidity and duckweed. Sitting on the bank and giving up trying to invent a new mechanism or tactic for clearing the pond, she calmed her mind. Going to a pond in a protected forest and spending time studying it, Benius listened to what nature was telling her. When she realized that her pond was silty and, having dug out deposits of silt, recreated in the reservoir the cold current inherent in a wild pond, she responded to nature with an echo.

    However, the dialogue between nature and man should not end there, says Benius. After we echo back, in gratitude for the help, we must promise to take care of nature. Therefore, having freed the pond from silt and duckweed, Benius planted local plants in it that would support the soil and prevent new siltation with regular floods.

    “For a long time we thought that we were better than nature, and now some of us tend to think that we are worse than it, and everything we touch turns into soot,” Benius reflects. But none of these points of view is correct. We need to remember what it's like to be on a par with other living beings."

    In one handful of soil live from four to five thousand bacteria. For most of them, we have not even come up with names, and it will take decades to understand how they work and why they are important for our lives. Modesty from the awareness of the limitations of our knowledge of nature and restraint in habits should be our new ideals, says Benius.

    What really sets us apart from all living beings is our ability to learn, she adds. Thanks to our unusual brain, we can look closely at nature and repeat after it. Our species is simply designed to be an echo of nature.

Benius concludes:

    “I was taught by Montana veterans that when talking to newcomers, it’s more important to ask not ‘When did you get here?’ but ‘How long do you plan to stay?’ advice on how we can be better neighbors for her.”

    

    

    .


    

When a poplar leaf floated on the surface of the water, it dawned on her: there is a current in the pond!  

Drawing AI Stable Diffusion: The Science of Drawing

Stable Diffusion AI is the place where art and science meet together And why it's important step for both art and science      There hav...